http://blog.b92.net/blog/10434/VADEMECUM/ Freedom of Information sr http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss rss@b92.net rss@b92.net Blog A-JE! RSS generator v0.3 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:56:19 +0000 http://blog.b92.net/user_stuff/avatars/mali/170/12170.jpg http://blog.b92.net/ 50 50 http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#k599251 http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#komentari Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:21:39 GMT Jelica Greganović http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/ http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#k599239
ne znam, mozda zato sto posmatram iz srbije u kojoj je drzavnom organu jednostavno dopusteno da ignorise bilo koji zahtev za nekim dokumentom, ovo mi i ne izgleda toliko lose
Ustvari,po zakonu nije tako.Ko bolje pogleda sadrzinu naseg Zakona o slobodnom pristupu informacijama videre da je rec o jednom od boljih,liberalnijih zakona.Naravno problem je sto ,zivimo u zemlji u kojoj vlast cesto krsi zakone,sve pa i ovaj.Ali bar, na srrecu,za poverenik za informacije je Rodoljub Sabic koji taj posao radi zaista odlicno..G-din Sabic radi svoj posao na nacin da ,u odnosu na tipicne srpske "nosioci funkcija" deluje superiorno,kao vanzemaljac.To uostalom potvrdjuje i svojim prisustvom na blogu.Vise od 90 % informacija koje u prethodno bile uskracene trazioci dobiju nakon intervencije poverenika,sto je odista sjajan rezultat.Bio sam u prilici da cujem eminentne strane eksperte da o radu naseg poverenika govore s izuzetnim postovanjem i ocenjuju ga tako da sam bio ponosan zbog toga: ]]> http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#komentari Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:08:28 GMT apectator http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/ http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#k598922 Naravno,ali ima "strucnjaka" i kod nas a eto i u EU koji svoje interese pretpostavljaju opstim,javnim interesima.
pa ne bih ja to tako citao.

moj utisak je bar na osnovu ovih 10 tacaka, da j epoenta dokumenta skretanje paznje na cinjenicu da je svaki dostupan (osim strogo propisanih) i da ako se zeli nesto sacuvati tajno, neka se pazi da se tako nesto i ne zapise ili komenatrise e--mailom.

ne znam, mozda zato sto posmatram iz srbije u kojoj je drzavnom organu jednostavno dopusteno da ignorise bilo koji zahtev za nekim dokumentom, ovo mi i ne izgleda toliko lose ]]> http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#komentari Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:58:00 GMT antioksidant http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/ http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#k598907 Pogotovo, što Vademecum, nema pretenziju da štiti nekakve bezbednosno relevantne informacije, podatke iz sfere odbrane, međunarodne politike ili sl. Naprotiv, ono što želi da štiti to su kontakti službenika „sa pojedinim preduzećima".


Nazalost ovo je jos jedan od dokaza o uzasno jakoj vezi izmedju vlasti i biznisa koji polako ali sigurno preuzima funkcije vlasti i sto je najgore dobija samopouzdanje te se sve redje krije. Danasnje demokratije su ugrozene a ovo je jos jedan od bestijalnih primera gde je interes biznisa iznad interesa ljudi - gradjana.. Nisam siguran koliko mu se narod-drzava-sistem moze odupreti u situaciji kakva je danas. ]]> http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#komentari Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:44:17 GMT drug.clan http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/ http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#k598906 1. All documents, including e-mails, held by the Commission, even if
we get them from third parties, are in principle subject to disclosure.
Naravno,ali ima "strucnjaka" i kod nas a eto i u EU koji svoje interese pretpostavljaju opstim,javnim interesima. ]]> http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#komentari Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:40:55 GMT apectator http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/ http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#k598889 10 things to remember on Access to Documents

1. All documents, including e-mails, held by the Commission, even if
we get them from third parties, are in principle subject to disclosure.

2. We must give reasons for any refusal based on the exceptions of
the Regulation (i.e. public security, defence and military matters;
harm to international relations; economic policy; protection of
privacy and integrity of individuals; protection of commercial
interests, court proceedings and legal advice; investigations; and
harm to decision making - which includes negotiating processes).

3. No type of documents held by DG Trade can be automatically
excluded from access: each document has to be examined case-bycase,
on the basis of its actual content (and not of its status), as to
whether any exception applies. This includes negotiating directives,
for example.

4. If only parts of a document are subject to an exception, the rest of
the document must still be released ("partial disclosure".

5. It is for the Commission to decide whether a document is
released or not. Third parties can be consulted in case of doubt –
but the Commission has the last word.

6. Deadlines to reply are very tight, i.e. within 15 working days.
Failure to reply is equivalent to refusing access.

7. Remedies: Refusals or partial disclosure can be appealed
("confirmatory application" to the Secretary General. If the refusal
is upheld, the applicant can go to the Court of First Instance or
complain to the Ombudsman.

8. When you request information from third parties (e.g. industry
questionnaires), do not forget to mention that the information they
provide is subject to the EU rules on Access to Documents.

9. Make sure your filing is reliable so that it is easy to find documents,
even after people have left the unit

10. Be aware that your documents, and especially meeting reports and
e-mails can potentially be disclosed. This must be kept in mind
when writing such documents. ]]> http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#komentari Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:31:22 GMT antioksidant http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/ http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#k598888 go with me ]]> http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/#komentari Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:27:10 GMT antioksidant http://blog.b92.net/text/10434/VADEMECUM/