Čini mi se da je Fajerabend hteo da kaže da postoji opasnost od apriori dominantne pozicija nauke u društvu. Jer , ukoliko ona nije u stanju da izdrži proveru, pa i borbu sa raznim vidovima pseudonauke, tako što će se sama izboriti sa njima dobrim kontrargumentima, nego će se zaklanjati iza svog autoriteta , onda može da se preobrazi u ideologiju koja se više ne preispituje i ne istražuje, nego udobno živi na stečenim pozicijama.

I da, astrologoija ne funkcioniše, ali se pokazalo da ne funkcionišu ni neke naučne teorije koje su dugo bile smatrane tačnim

On pretpostavljam, ima dokaze da prizivanje kise izaziva kisu? BTW astrologija ne radi, to je masu puta dokazano, ali se budale i neznalice i dalje pecaju na to. Tvrditi da je rasista neko ko ne veruje u manitua, bajanje itd je krajnje bezobrazno.

Nauka nije ideologija, pa ne moze biti ni represivna ideologija.

ukratko, po njemu, drustvo treba da je zasticeno od svih ideologija, osim ideologije postmodernizma
**************************************
Sve tece, sve se menja, a na kraju svega je marksizam. Pardon, postmodernizam.

He was especially indignant about the condescending attitudes of many scientists towards alternative traditions. For example, he thought that negative opinions about astrology and the effectivity of rain dances were not justified by scientific research, and dismissed the predominantly negative attitudes of scientists towards such phenomena as elitist or racist.

In his opinion, science has become a repressing ideology, even though it arguably started as a liberating movement. Feyerabend thought that a pluralistic society should be protected from being influenced too much by science, just as it is protected from other ideologies.

ukratko, po njemu, drustvo treba da je zasticeno od svih ideologija, osim ideologije postmodernizma

dolybell92

Gorane, hvala, a sada ćemo videti i kakva je Srđanova moć ubeđivanja. Unapred - dobrodošao (kao i svi ostali). Ubedi me s jednu reč...

Feyerabend described science as being essentially anarchistic, obsessed with its own mythology, and as making claims to truth well beyond its actual capacity. He was especially indignant about the condescending attitudes of many scientists towards alternative traditions. For example, he thought that negative opinions about astrology and the effectivity of rain dances were not justified by scientific research, and dismissed the predominantly negative attitudes of scientists towards such phenomena as elitist or racist. In his opinion, science has become a repressing ideology, even though it arguably started as a liberating movement. Feyerabend thought that a pluralistic society should be protected from being influenced too much by science, just as it is protected from other ideologies.