The Smoking Thing: Why Americans Dread Visiting Serbia

B92 Blog

Članovi

Rosemary Bailey Brown

The Smoking Thing: Why Americans Dread Visiting Serbia

01:11
NED
04
NOV

The Smoking Thing: Why Americans Dread Visiting Serbia

According to The Economist's 2008 World Rankings Book, the average Serb (man, woman, and child) smokes 5.8 cigs per day, ranking them as the Top 9 Most Smoking Countries on Earth. That's a lot of smoking.

Greece comes in at #1 with 8.4 cigs per day; Macedonia is #2 at 7.1 cigs per day, Russia is #3 at 6.8, and Slovenia kicks Serbian smoker ass at #5 with 6.2 cigs per day. Bosnia is below at #13 (5.2 per day) and Croatia is not ranked on the list. Yet oddly, Croatia has by far the highest cancer deaths rate of the region at 167 deaths per 100,000 population. (Serbia spends a far higher percent of the GDP on public healthcare, so that may make the difference.)

OK, one might be tempted to make jokes about the confluence of the Orthodox Church and smoking, or the whole Slavic + Balkans and smoking thing.

Actually because I'm American and as everyone knows, Americans are all about money, I will say that I'm awfully tempted to do the math. That is ~8 million Serbs times 5.8 cigs per day times the average cost per cig... Frankly no one who smokes that much can tell me they are seriously poor. You may be stupid and/or smelly, but you certainly have some money in your pocket.

I say this as a former 20-year smoker. I like most of my generation in the US quit. Only 22% of Americans smoke and the rest are often former smokers who have the nastiness of converts when it comes to dealing with the still-smoking masses. Blech! Phew! Icky, icky-poo!

In fact the ONLY thing I worried about before moving to Sombor Serbia for this Summer and part of the fall was the smoke. Would I be unable to enjoy society, cafes and private get-togethers because of unremitting smoke? I'd heard and read on blogs online many horror stories - mainly about Belgrade.

Turns out it's not so bad in Sombor where we had many friends and relatives who did not smoke. Yeah, in one of the smokingest countries in the world I met a lot of non-smokers, and I wasn't expecting or seeking them out.

So I was lucky. But such is the prejudice against smoking here in the US, and yes I do agree with this cultural anti-smoking bent, that if I had to spend much time in Belgrade I would be worried about it. And I bet it's something the tourist board never considered....

Most shocking moment in Sombor: Seeing ash trays on display at an office supply store. Whoa - 1980s flash back!

So what's your take on smoking in Serbia? Does it stop you from enjoying the country, restaurants or society as you'd like to? Or do you just wish whining anti-smokers would shut up already?

Komentari (82)

Sakrij replike | Pošaljite komentar

okapoaniolz 02:24 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 14

Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link Replika: 12

Pusenje ili zdravlje, odlucite sami?

Pusenje, naravno.

p.s.
ako me neko ko nikad nije pusio zamoli da ugasim cigaretu, uvek cu to da uradim, ali bivsi pusaci (cast izuzecima) treba da vise na grani samo zbog kolicine agresije koju usmeravaju prema pusacima.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Unfuckable 02:29 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

okapoaniolz
Pusenje ili zdravlje, odlucite sami?

Pusenje, naravno.

p.s.
ako me neko ko nikad nije pusio zamoli da ugasim cigaretu, uvek cu to da uradim, ali bivsi pusaci (cast izuzecima) treba da vise na grani samo zbog kolicine agresije koju usmeravaju prema pusacima.

pooshimo jer voulimo...

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Mungos 03:16 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 14

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Rosemary Bailey Brown
Greece comes in at #1 with 8.4 cigs per day; Macedonia is #2 at 7.1 cigs per day, Russia is #3 at 6.8, and Slovenia kicks Serbian smoker ass at #5 with 6.2 cigs per day. Bosnia is below at #13 (5.2 per day) and Croatia is not ranked on the list.

That only shows who are the most soul and cool people on the Earth.(I am very serious about that)

Rosemary Bailey Brown
Yet oddly, Croatia has by far the highest cancer deaths rate of the region at 167 deaths per 100,000 population

Did anybody ever had published studies about highly cancerous effect of the gasoline, especially leaded one? Just as a comparison, staying at the corner of an intersection with a moderately frequent traffic, waiting for the "green" to cross the street, SMOKES ABOUT 200 CIGARETTES! (+ other poisons that are not contained in the cigarettes)

Radojcic
Jamaica on that list?

Weed doesn't count, 'bro!:)

Unfuckable
Pusenje ili zdravlje, odlucite sami? Pusenje, naravno.

Lizanje, brate!;)

Mungos, The Realistic Smoker

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Unfuckable 04:21 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Pusenje ili zdravlje, odlucite sami? Pusenje, naravno.
Lizanje, brate!;)

Mungos, The Realistic Smoker

/quote]

ma ja sam napisao pooshimo jer voulimo...
al može i leessagne, why not ?
...nije mi palo na pamet....pamet.....

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

marumi 06:11 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Pusenje ili zdravlje, odlucite sami?

Ne nepusaci ili bivsi pusaci, vec pusaci su agresivni. Sinoc na jednom rodjendanu umalo da se svi pogusimo. Pusaci nisu gasili cigarete iako je bilo pristuno vise nepusaca. Meni se povracalo od odvratnog smrada i bukvalno mi je pripala muka. Tek bivsi pusaci mogu da razumeju i jedne i druge jer znaju razliku izmedju perioda kada su pusili i sada kada mogu normalno da disu. Da nije agresivnih pusaca, naravno.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Milan M. Ćirković 06:46 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Mungos

Did anybody ever had published studies about highly cancerous effect of
the gasoline, especially leaded one?

But as far as I know leaded gasoline has been prohibited long ago (in 70s or so) and for much more serious reason than the cancer rate - the danger of lead poisoning and induced disorders including several heavy mental illnesses being much higher per unit time than the danger of cancer... That is one of the rare examples where concern for public health did outweigh any private and corporate savings achieved with the leaded gas.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Srki 07:39 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Milan M. Ćirković
Mungos

But as far as I know leaded gasoline has been prohibited long ago (in 70s or so) and for much more serious reason than the cancer rate - the danger of lead poisoning and induced disorders including several heavy mental illnesses being much higher per unit time than the danger of cancer... That is one of the rare examples where concern for public health did outweigh any private and corporate savings achieved with the leaded gas.

That explains some things in Serbia ;-).

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Milan Rakić 08:31 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Mungos
Rosemary Bailey Brown
Greece comes in at #1 with 8.4 cigs per day; Macedonia is #2 at 7.1 cigs per day, Russia is #3 at 6.8, and Slovenia kicks Serbian smoker ass at #5 with 6.2 cigs per day. Bosnia is below at #13 (5.2 per day) and Croatia is not ranked on the list.

That only shows who are the most soul and cool people on the Earth.(I am very serious about that)

If smoking is your hallmark of being cool then you have odd merits. If the government would have a much stronger and louder anti-smoking campaign the view on that would change, however, with the current smoking-lobby in Serbia, one can just forget it.

Mungos

Rosemary Bailey Brown
Yet oddly, Croatia has by far the highest cancer deaths rate of the region at 167 deaths per 100,000 population

Did anybody ever had published studies about highly cancerous effect of the gasoline, especially leaded one? Just as a comparison, staying at the corner of an intersection with a moderately frequent traffic, waiting for the "green" to cross the street, SMOKES ABOUT 200 CIGARETTES! (+ other poisons that are not contained in the cigarettes)

Well, in western Europe you can ONLY buy unleaded and Eco-Diesel, as for Serbia, you know the drill.

Mungos

Radojcic
Jamaica on that list?

Weed doesn't count, 'bro!:)

What a revelation of an answer.

Mungos

Unfuckable
Pusenje ili zdravlje, odlucite sami? Pusenje, naravno.

Lizanje, brate!;)

To get serious, no one in Serbia thinks of the non-smokers and small children. If I get guests and ask them not to smoke (or go outside) because of my 16 months old son, they get offended and proudly state that "they will not visit people at which place they cannot smoke". I cannot go outside and have a coffee because every bar is a Mecca for smokers, and god-forbid you ask the person next to you to respect your presence and non-smoking stand, most probably they would start a fight with you right away. We are fare away from becoming a state where health prevails and respect for other persons, and that is brilliantly described in the post cancer, further below. I think this answers the question "Smoking or health".

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Mungos 09:44 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Milan M. Ćirković
Mungos

Did anybody ever had published studies about highly cancerous effect of
the gasoline, especially leaded one?

But as far as I know leaded gasoline has been prohibited long ago (in 70s or so) and for much more serious reason than the cancer rate - the danger of lead poisoning and induced disorders including several heavy mental illnesses being much higher per unit time than the danger of cancer... That is one of the rare examples where concern for public health did outweigh any private and corporate savings achieved with the leaded gas.

Milan, it seems you have missed the point. I would appreciate if you could read mine post again.
Anyway, I didn't think of the leaded gasoline, exclusively, but about gasoline in general. In addition, an ingredient MTBE in unleaded gasoline, which substitutes Tethra-ethil-lead, has exactly the same effect! Even worse, evaporates more or less easily from unburned gasoline.
Years ago I was reading some studies, preformed by independent scientists, because NOBODY wanted to finance such things officially (WHY?) and findings are just stunning!

Finally, anti-smoking campaign had started after the death of the ex-US Vice-president's Al Gore sister, from the lung cancer. (Just to note that Gore's family was one of the biggest tobacco-producers in the state of Tennessee and US, as well.)

Why the tobacco business is still so profitable and tobacco industry is one of the top ones?

Mungos, The Concerned of Bullshiters

P.S. I like that "heavy mental illness":))))))))

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Rosemary Bailey Brown 13:26 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Jamaica is not on the list, neither is anywhere in North or South America. (Yes I know Mexico City is one of the most polluted places on earth, but not apparently from over-smoking.) And isn't that ironic, given where tobacco came from in the first place?

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

ugly 07:17 05.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Finally, anti-smoking campaign had started after the death of the ex-US Vice-president's Al Gore sister, from the lung cancer.

This is not quite simple as that. Minnesota enacted the first smoking ban in US seven years before Gore's sister died. California did it in mid 80's, but majority of other stated waited till the 21st century.

Therefore, I wouldn't necessarily throw Gore (which I personally dislike) into the equation, since there is no clear evidence that the two events are somehow related.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Brunehilda 11:28 20.05.2008

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Ne, dragi moj. Smrt svim nedokazanim pušačima koji smatraju da je njihovo pravo na trovanje i sebe i drugih veće od prava nepušača i bivših pušaća da ne budu trovani i osuđeni da se guše u neizdrživom smradu cigarete i pikavaca.

Ja, kao bivši 20-godišnji pušač, kažem BLJAK i još uvek ne mogu da shvatim samu sebe kako sam mogla uopšte da uvlačim taj odvratni smrdljivi dim u svoja pluća. Najviše se ljutim pre svega na SAMU SEBE, a pušače žalim jer nisu svesni da ubijaju lagano i neprimetno, ajd što same sebe, to je njihov izbor, nego i svoju okolinu gde uglavnom najviše deca istih stradaju, ni kriva ni dužna.

Kamo lepe sreće da ovah tipično srpski mentalitet i komentar : "Bivši pušači su najgori" što pre nestane i da pušači shvate da koliko god oni imaju pravo da odaberu da sebe truju, drugi imaju još veće pravo da odaberu da ne budu trovani, gušeni u smradu cigarete samo zato što pušać želi da vrši svoje lagano samoubistvo za koje misli da je gle, zadovoljstvo! Međutim, mislim da, što se toga tiče, Srbija najmanje 40 godina kaska za ostalim evropskim zemljama, a za USA, neću ni da pominjem, dele ih svetlosne godine...

Meni lično, i to oduvek a ne samo od kad sam prestala da pušim, to je bio najveći problem pri mojim posetama rodne grude. Neverovatno je koliko su ljudi u Srbiji NESVESNI svoje fatalne greške i sa koliko puno drčnosti traže i brane svoje pravo na ubijanje sebe i drugih, i kako svoje pravo na cigaretu uzimaju kao neko prirodno pravo, i ne pada im na pamet da li možda ipak nekom mogu da smetaju. Jedna mala anegdota.

Pre neku godinu, kad sam bila u poseti svojoj porodici i prijateljima u Srbiji, dogovorih se sa jednom prijateljicom da odemo na ručak. Dok smo tako nas dve ručkale i čavrljale, javila se još jedna prijateljica i rekla da će doći do restorana. Nakon izvesnog vremena, da druga ulazi u restoran, prilazi našem stolu za kojim nas dve još uvek jedemo, seda i mrtva ladna vadi cigarete i pali duvajući dim u naše zabezeknute face (zabezeknutija sam bila ja, nego ova druga, što je valjda normalno) a ja ne mogu prosto da poverujem onome što vidim... To se na zapadu vidi kao prvoklasna nekultura i samoživost, dok se u Srbiji vidi kao nešto sasvim normalno i ne dao ti bog da prigovoriš, jer ćeš odmah biti žigosan kao "taj dosadni bivši pušač, šta se tu sad folira a pušio je tolike godine... " Neverovatno!

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Brunehilda 11:45 20.05.2008

Preporuka: 0

Re: Smrt bivsim pusacima

#Link

Srki

Milan M. Ćirković

Mungos

But as far as I know leaded gasoline has been prohibited long ago (in 70s or so) and for much more serious reason than the cancer rate - the danger of lead poisoning and induced disorders including several heavy mental illnesses being much higher per unit time than the danger of cancer... That is one of the rare examples where concern for public health did outweigh any private and corporate savings achieved with the leaded gas.

That explains some things in Serbia ;-).

Oooo, yes, indeeed! :)

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Radojicic 02:24 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Where is

#Link Replika: 0

Greece comes in at #1 with 8.4 cigs per day; Macedonia is #2 at 7.1 cigs per day, Russia is #3 at 6.8, and Slovenia kicks Serbian smoker ass at #5 with 6.2 cigs per day. Bosnia is below at #13 (5.2 per day) and Croatia is not ranked on the list. Yet oddly, Croatia has by far the highest cancer deaths rate of the region at 167 deaths per 100,000 population. (Serbia spends a far higher percent of the GDP on public healthcare, so that may make the difference.)

Jamaica on that list?

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Srki 07:37 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

cancer

#Link Replika: 1

"Yet oddly, Croatia has by far the highest cancer deaths rate of the region at 167 deaths per 100,000 population. (Serbia spends a far higher percent of the GDP on public health care, so that may make the difference.)"

Yet another crooked reasoning of yours, like one about Serbian programmers in California...Why are you doing this? Are you misinformed, or evil minded, or just plain dumb?

Serbia is maybe spending larger percent of GDP, but it is more likely because people are of generally poor health and prevention functions by principle "Dear God save me from getting sick" - other then children immunizations it doesn't exist as a category. I guess everybody is too busy with Kosovo, RS, tycoons, Cuba etc. And hating Americans, and EU too!

And the health care system is like all those bankrupted former socialistic companies - it is rotten and sucks big time ! And if the government doesn't put money there, they strike! It is totally backwards and inefficient. Most of "doctors" are very incompetent, the others are just plain jerks, with perhaps very few exceptions...

I just got my mom out of hospital in Belgrade, for post-hearth attack treatment. It is very scary and sad what she had to go through. After she survived the attack, they told her that she is alright and she can wait with coronarography, and there is no available spots anyway, waiting list is about 1 year long, unless you bribe, which means kick out of list some poor soul, because you have money and someone else doesn't. Fair enough! Then, when they called her out of blue, after 4 months, they found on the examination that she had one of the main hearth arteries 100% blocked and another one 95%!. So basically, she was with one leg in grave and they let her walk away. For 4 months!
Then they sent her home after supposedly successful angioplasty and forgot to tell her if she is supposed to stay in bed, or she can walk. They gave her 11 different prescription drugs, but no one bothered to write her down when to take them, so she had to call friends (medical tech) to ask. Calling hospital is practically out of question - phones are always busy, and you can only talk to some nervous nurse that will give you her opinion, why to bother doctors with that?,... She suffered some serious side effects and when she complained to her doctor, he told her that is bullshit, these are all good medicine and she is hypochondriac. Until she read the label on one of the drugs she was getting, describing all the side effects she was experiencing. In a normal country, we would have enough material to sue the damn bastards, to spend their lives in jail! But not in Serbia...In other words, if you end up stuck with doctors in Serbia, you are more or less in God's hands...

Speaking of smoking, I talked to my US friends after visiting Belgrade (somehow they got really sick there, I believe from potable water, or some crap in the food - last year even I got ill, America spoiled me ;-)) and they were complaining not that much about smoking (perhaps because I didn't take them even close to nightclubs, where they would probably suffocate or got killed in some gang-related incident ), but about the air pollution in general, that comes mainly from leaded gas used in vehicles, and from some third-world leftover industry that still operates in downtown. Luckily, they didn't have to see Panchevo...

I hate to say this, because my mom was a smoker for 40 years - they are totally selfish and hypocritical, and if there is one thing I admire US for, it is the proper treatment smokers get here - as you know, if you smoke here, everybody takes you as a mentally ill person, or a redneck at least...Not to mention how you are gonna get health insurance if you enjoyed tobacco products for last ten years...

So, if someone decides to move to Serbia, despite all the everyday life crap, be aware you are gonna have to breed on your gills, until you get sick. And then you'll have chance to experience the inferno of Serbian health care...As I said last time, good luck, and don't sayl you were not warned :-).

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Rosemary Bailey Brown 13:33 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: cancer

#Link

Yes, unleaded gas is far worse for you than smoking, according to health journals. However, I (stupidly) never worried about that before I came to Serbia for the simple reason I didn't know it existed and even if I had, I had no experience of it to make a judgement. If you tell my US friends, "I have to go somewhere where many people smoke indoors" they will all look horrified and feel sorry for you. If you tell my US friends, "I have to go somewhere where cars are old and use unleaded gas." They will look confused and not really care because they have no idea of the smell or implications. It just doesn't come up in life here, but nearly everyone's been trapped with a smoker at some time in their life and hated it....

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Mungos 09:54 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

Why Americans Dread Visiting Serbia?

#Link Replika: 1

Let me finally answer on that question:
- According to mine experience, here in the US, most of the Americans think that there is still fighting in Serbia ("Yugoslavia"). Just to add that the most still don't have clue where Serbia really is, especially not about smoking habits!:)
- Even before, Americans were not visiting YU that much. Out of all of the US visitors, were mostly (again my personal experience) people of a certain profession which I am not going to discuss here.

Mongoose, The Realistic

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Rosemary Bailey Brown 13:34 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: Why Americans Dread Visiting Serbia?

#Link

That's true - but if you have to come here because you married a Serb (act of fate), then the smoking dread begins...

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Xenon 10:57 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

ma baš si realističan...

#Link Replika: 4

...ubilo se...

Mungos, if that what you're doing (smoking) is so nice and harmless, tell me then why I start suffocating in every night-club in Belgrade and most of cafes. Why after only 15 minutes spent in such a place my girlfriend's eyes start to tear? I'm not overreacting or joking, those things really do happen. Nobody at my (and hers) home smokes, and I'm just not used to it - and I don't wan't to get used to it - because it's really bad thing to get used to. How would you feel if somebody would force you to get addicted (or at least get used to its unpleasant effects) to cocaine...

And why is such a large percentage of arrogant and "proud" (how can you be proud about doing something that kills you, your loved ones and people around you?) smokers like you one of the reasons I like this city less...

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Mungos 11:24 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

Re: ma baš si realističan...

#Link

Xenon
...ubilo se...

Mungos, if that what you're doing (smoking) is so nice and harmless, tell me then why I start suffocating in every night-club in Belgrade and most of cafes. Why after only 15 minutes spent in such a place my girlfriend's eyes start to tear? I'm not overreacting or joking, those things really do happen. Nobody at my (and hers) home smokes, and I'm just not used to it - and I don't wan't to get used to it - because it's really bad thing to get used to. How would you feel if somebody would force you to get addicted (or at least get used to its unpleasant effects) to cocaine...

And why is such a large percentage of arrogant and "proud" (how can you be proud about doing something that kills you, your loved ones and people around you?) smokers like you one of the reasons I like this city less...

I am afraid that I am not understood well! I am not pushing that smoking is harmless. I am just trying to put the things in the proper order: why nobody is talking about harmfulness of the gasoline, which is many times worse than tobacco?
My example: I have an asthma! And I smoke almost 25 years, about 1,5 (sometimes even 2) packs a day. In Belgrade, starting 1999. (after many years of pause) I wouldn't dare to move somewhere without the "pump". Living in Radnicka street - very frequent oneI was having extremely serious attacks. Since I came in the US where the cars must meet very strict gas-emition standards and there is no unleaded gasoline, I almost have no any problem, almost don't know where my "pump" is, year-round ! Why?
BTW, as a smoker-asthmatic, I am able to run long distances, to skate at full (very high) speed for almost two hours, 11 years ago I had set my personal record diving 18m deep, w/out equipment. Last year, while being drunk with some US Navy guys in one Irish pub, I responded to a challenge of one of the officers: not to breath for a full minute...I have endured almost 1:30 measured by precise marine chronometer. (I could have done even more, but I wanted to make some gig - tried to drink "Guiness" while keeping my nose blocked...:)))
So, I really don't understand....

Mongoose, The Endurable

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Xenon 11:49 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: ma baš si realističan...

#Link

Gasoline is completely different matter! And it's not true that nobody's talking about it. And you're completely right, Belgrade is ovepolluted by gasoline. But that's not the topic of Rosemary's post, so I just don't see why would we talk about it here.

Also, one doesn't drive cars in closed areas. In people's homes, in offices, in cafes and restaurants and night-clubs, there's way more cigarette induced smoke than that of car pollution. Do we agree on this and do you understand? :)

About health, good for you, but I have an uncle with throat cancer and a 23 years old friend who coughs all the time. Your health is maybe fine, but I know many people whose health isn't fine due to effects of smoking - and guess what - most of them continue to smoke nonetheless!

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Mungos 12:10 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: ma baš si realističan...

#Link

Xenon
Gasoline is completely different matter! And it's not true that nobody's talking about it. And you're completely right, Belgrade is ovepolluted by gasoline. But that's not the topic of Rosemary's post, so I just don't see why would we talk about it here.

Also, one doesn't drive cars in closed areas. In people's homes, in offices, in cafes and restaurants and night-clubs, there's way more cigarette induced smoke than that of car pollution. Do we agree on this and do you understand? :)

About health, good for you, but I have an uncle with throat cancer and a 23 years old friend who coughs all the time. Your health is maybe fine, but I know many people whose health isn't fine due to effects of smoking - and guess what - most of them continue to smoke nonetheless!

I am so sorry for your surrounding's problems.
Your point is OK, too!
Rosemaries point is smoking in Serbia, primarily, as a reason for which Americans are repulsed from us. I am just trying to say that it is not the worst evil...

Mongoose, The Sees More

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

plamenezore 16:16 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: ma baš si realističan...

#Link

My story is quite opposite of yours. I have lived in the city of Pancevo for the first 34 years of my life, after which I moved to Vancouver, Canada. For those that are not aware of the fact, Pancevo is one of the most polluted cities on this planet. I used to joke that smoking in Pancevo is beneficial to its inhabitants as it forms a protective coating of tar in your lungs, isolating the lung tissue from much worse air pollutants. Opposite of that, Vancouver area is a city with cleanest and most pleasant air in the world when it comes to heavily populated urban areas.

I used to smoke for 26 years (since I was 17), and paradoxically never had any breathing problems in Serbia. It is only when I moved to Vancouver that I started to cough heavily. Six months after the move I was diagnosed with asthma. I had to move away from strong tobacco types which I adored, to the mildest possible ones. Interestingly, whenever I went back to Serbia, I would regain proper breathing, and was able to smoke my favorite filterless strong brands such as Lucky Strike, Camel or Gauloises. At first I blamed it on Canadian tobacco. I thought they put something in their cigarettes I am oversensitive to. Alas, the experiment with smoking Canadian tobacco in Serbia produced no change. I was still OK there. It became obvious that there is something in the clean Vancouver's air that I am irritated by.

Nevertheless, I have enjoyed my portion of smoking and coughing for many years on until one night I ended up in one of the Vancouver's hospitals, heavily grasping for air. I quit! I admit - men are chicken. The first near-death experience and they quit. That would never happen to a real woman :-) Seriously, in North America, the most smokers are women, as they are much harder to quit for some reason.

The results improved gradually. At first, immediately after recovery, my breathing was heavier without cigarettes!? Please, be aware that it was coughing, rather than breathing I had problems with before the attack. I reckoned that it was due to the lack of CO2 I got used to over time, as that gas is known to calm down the alveoli swelling (that's why asthmatics breathe in a bag when the vicious circle of hyperventilation starts). Indeed, a few months after quitting, the situation much improved and I was able to breathe fully, with no coughing at all.

Clearly, my body could deal with either smoking or being subjected to the Vancouver's air irritant (whatever that is), but not with both at the same time.

My conclusion is that what matters is highly individual and substantially depends on the environment. For example, my children are perfectly OK in Vancouver, but when they go to Serbia during summer they are constantly on antihistamines. On winter, they are fine, which proves the pollution is not the major reason their eyes swell.

Mirko

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Sofroniye 12:06 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Suggestion

#Link Replika: 0

Why don't you write an article about child molesting and then as part of it you may be tempted to make a joke about "confluence" of Catholic Church and child molestation especially in United States and Ireland? Now, that would be something to read. Or maybe "money laundering" ? I could give you a hint for a joke related to that case...Banco Ambrosiano...

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

jinks 12:29 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

No offense,

#Link Replika: 0

but the smoke stench is one of the worst ever (especially when you find out that your jacket, clothes, hair, have picked it up, even after you manage to catch the breath of “fresh” air outside the chamber saturated with smoke fumes).

p.s.

living in one of the most air-contaminated streets here, so … sometimes, even the gasoline and diesel exhausts smell better.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Krugolina Borup 13:05 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

smokers of the world - unite!

#Link Replika: 15

Rosemary, I truly love America, and I love American people. I find them some of the most generous people on Earth. But, when it comes to smoking... I find myself describing USA with very, very bad set of words, like: discrimination, infrigement of human rights, harassement and maltreatment. (If it's any comfort, UK is worse. Plus, they are nowhere near as generous.)

Don't get me wrong: I'm all for protecting non-smokers rights to fresh air, be it because they believe in this made-up and dreamed-up threat of passive smoking, or just pure stinking reasons. Non-smokers are entitled to fresh air, no question about it. It is their "human right". But, NOT BY CANCELING MY RIGHTS, mind you! However, that is exactly what this anti-smoking global campaign is all about: it is not about protecting non-smokers. It is about canceling the rights of smokers.

The problem can be solved in so many other ways! Let's just have places one can smoke in and places one can't smoke in. This is a non-smoking flight? Where's a smoking one? Oh, but no. That's not what non-smokers want. They want to sit WITH the smokers, enjoy their company, but WITHOUT smokers smoking! That is harrasement.

And, before anyone jumps in to say non-smokers are harresed by smokers, let me say I agree: in Serbia, they are. We should do something about it, and make some restaurants and bars exclusivly non-smoking. BUT NOT ALL OF THEM.

People quiting smoking over health concerns - it all just boils down to the society-induced, advertized and encouraged fear of death. Such a stupid thing to fall for, really. Death is inevitable. There's no guarantees. Two of my very good friends died very young - one with 28 years of age (killed in a car accident in USA, mind you, where he went to study at the MIT, after he got their scholarship), and another one was aged about 40 when electricity killed him in a bathtub, during his holiday in Montenegro. Both were non-smokers. I lived through 77 days of thinking wheter I'm gonna end up being a collateral damage of the bombing. And, now I should fear cigarette??? As I said - dying is inevitable. If the cards I've been dealt by God say it's going to be from smoking, then so be it. I've already outlived two non-smokers I know.

As for the Tourist Organization of Belgrade not thinking enough of the smoking in capital - I agree. They should actually advertize it. Best way to profit in the future will be from smoking tourism. Provided that we don't fall for the global anti-smoking conspiracy and discrimination, that is.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Rosemary Bailey Brown 13:48 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

I agree with you on the segregation - many restaurants, bars and hotels in the US have separate sections for the smokers vs non-smokers and I think that works out well. In some States all smoking in public places is illegal, but then it's a good make new friends if you are new in town, by going outside with the smokers.

I don't know the science of second hand smoke, but understand there is a controversy about it. However the tobacco lobby is so strong that they may have "created" the controversy.

I do, however, know that smoking causes far higher levels of cancer and medical costs associated with cancer can be very high. So when you smoke, you are COSTING your fellow tax payers money as they will someday have to pay for your associated medical bills in many countries. You're also diverting tax-funds from other needs.

But really, if the stink of a cig didn't linger for ages, then I probably would not mind. It's like a fart that stays in the air for hours and even days. Can you imagine living someplace where it smells like farts and everytime you come home you have to wash your hair and clothing of the long lasting fart smell?

You want to fart, do it in your own PRIVATE fart room. Not in a public place.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Srki 17:23 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Rosemary Bailey Brown

I don't know the science of second hand smoke, but understand there is a controversy about it. However the tobacco lobby is so strong that they may have "created" the controversy.

There is no controversy about passive smoking. Common, use your common sense if you are not educated or informed. If everybody agrees that smoke kills smoker, it is got to something with the smoke, right?!. Do you inhale the very same smoke that smoker's cigarette produces? Yes you do. Therefore you got the same crap in your lungs as the smoker one. So there is no space for arguing here!

The argument that Krugolina is similar to one against global warming...I think smokers, as basically ill persons,
have enough rights in any developed country - they don't get arrested for act of polluting the environment, and EPA still doesn't deal with them. However, in shitty countries like Serbia for example, they fully enjoy their Nazi habit, and even try to convince people around that what they are doing (poisoning everybody around) is exercising their civil liberties. Bullshit of epic proportions.

I can add one more thing - there is nothing as disgusting as kissing with a smoking girlfriend - I believe it tastes like a wet ashtray.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Krugolina Borup 19:52 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Rosemary:
I agree with you on the segregation - many restaurants, bars and hotels in the US have separate sections for the smokers vs non-smokers and I think that works out well.

I used to think USA is the most horrible when it comes to smoking bans... until I've spent 5 days in England around and during last weekend. It is utterly horrible. It is out or nowhere. USA ban depends much on the state we are talking about. Florida was quite ok, if something didn't change meantime.:-) But I understand California is quite strict. And I hear they are talking about introducing (or have already introduced?) bans even on some of the open spaces, like beaches. Would you happen to know if that is true?

Rosemary:
I don't know the science of second hand smoke, but understand there is a controversy about it. However the tobacco lobby is so strong that they may have "created" the controversy.

I read a study that followed HUGE sample (like, 200.000 or 300.000 people - married couples) for a LONG period of time (like 20 to 30 years), one being smoker, the other one passive smoker. Conclusion? Negative on passive smoking risks. Yes, it was financed by the tobacco producers. But, no one else has ever bothered to check this out, no one wants to invest in a study that they know or very strongly suspect will give a result they don't want. The study was published in the British Medical Journal, which is an authoritative publication. If they thought it was wrong, they would never have published it.

Then I read a study which concluded how mothers smoking in pregnancy increases the risk of type 2 diabetes. They followed about 11.300 or thereabout children of mothers that smoked during pregnancy for 30 or so years. And, after 30 years, 28 (twentyeight) of them got type 2 diabetes. And that is the "statistically significant figure" to conclude that smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of geting it???? I am not impressed. And then that data gets manipulated by the media who take "may increase the risk" and turn it into "causes diabetes".

I don't think there's a controversy about it. I think there is a well though out campaign to "streighten out" the "crooked, smelly smokers". Like, a deliberate, planned thing. Why smokers and not people that drink alcohol... will be a mistery for me until I die.

Rosemary:
I do, however, know that smoking causes far higher levels of cancer and medical costs associated with cancer can be very high. So when you smoke, you are COSTING your fellow tax payers money as they will someday have to pay for your associated medical bills in many countries. You're also diverting tax-funds from other needs.

So, what? Money has to be spent somewhere. It is also spent on treating diseases induced by car pollution, but no one is trying to ban the driving. It is also spent on teating diseases induced by drinking alcohol, but no one is baning drinking in pubs and bars and restaurants.

BTW, UK health service, NHS, estimates that costs of treating the diseases induced by alcohol are 1.7 billion GBP per year. At the same time, those induced by smoking are between 1.4 and 1.7 GBP. In other words - LESS then in the case of alcohol.

As I said, you have to die of something. And rare are the ones that die healthy. So, we are all bound to take some of the costs from the tax payers money sooner or later. And the big question is: how much money will be spent on treating pneumonias that smokers are gonna catch up while smoking outside????

Rosemary:
But really, if the stink of a cig didn't linger for ages, then I probably would not mind. It's like a fart that stays in the air for hours and even days. Can you imagine living someplace where it smells like farts and everytime you come home you have to wash your hair and clothing of the long lasting fart smell?

Wouldn't really know. But, I get nauseus and dizzy and sick when next to a person wearing a parfume. It's such an individual thing, really.

Rosemary:
You want to fart, do it in your own PRIVATE fart room. Not in a public place.

Ok. Provided that those wearing parfumes, wear them in their PRIVATE parfume rooms. Not in a public place.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Krugolina Borup 20:09 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Srki
There is no controversy about passive smoking. Common, use your common sense if you are not educated or informed. If everybody agrees that smoke kills smoker, it is got to something with the smoke, right?!. Do you inhale the very same smoke that smoker's cigarette produces? Yes you do. Therefore you got the same crap in your lungs as the smoker one. So there is no space for arguing here!

Many interesting questions you raise here, Srki darling.

a) Everybody agrees that smoke kills smoker? Where did you get that one from? Smoking may (or may not) increase the risk of getting some forms of cancer. You can also be a life long nonsmoker and a life long passive nonsmoker - and still die of some form of cancer. You can also smoke all your life, and die of something not induced by smoking. Like, a bomb or car accident, for example. Or, of old age, even.

b) You get the same smoke in your lungs if you passivly inhale the smoke, as the smoke a smoker gets into his/her lungs? Wrong Srki, darling! Since you were the first one to raise the question of the level of "education and information" - go inform yourself before you open your mouth next time, please.

Srki:
The argument that Krugolina is similar to one against global warming...I think smokers, as basically ill persons, have enough rights in any developed country - they don't get arrested for act of polluting the environment, and EPA still doesn't deal with them. However, in shitty countries like Serbia for example, they fully enjoy their Nazi habit, and even try to convince people around that what they are doing (poisoning everybody around) is exercising their civil liberties. Bullshit of epic proportions.

Now, Srki darling, that is plane rude of you! Nevaspitanje of epic proportions! Or, maybe not. Maybe it is "a condition". Maybe you are actually projecting a lot of displaced anger onto the totaly wrong and unapropriate target. I wouldn't really know. Is there a psychologer in the house?

Rosemary:
I can add one more thing - there is nothing as disgusting as kissing with a smoking girlfriend - I believe it tastes like a wet ashtray.

Ah... so that's where it stems from... Tell me, Srki darling, did that smoking girlfriend of yours, actually dumped you or hurt you in any way, so now all girls that smoke suffer of your displaced anger towards her?? Projection, or what?

Ostaj mi dobro, zdravo i na svežem vazduhu!
Krugolina - the wanna-be-psychologer and the wet-ashtray kisser.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Nietzsches Aprentice 20:54 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Tell me, Srki darling, did that smoking girlfriend of yours, actually dumped you or hurt you in any way, so now all girls that smoke suffer of your displaced anger towards her?? Projection, or what?

How does this change the fact that it is pretty nasty when you kiss a smoking person?

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Brooklyn 21:03 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

it is pretty nasty when you kiss a smoking person

i imagine it's like kissing an ashtray, unless he/she has bad teeth. than it must be worse.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Nietzsches Aprentice 21:11 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

then you wouldn't be kissing the person, now, would you :)?

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Kazezoze 21:59 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

The Picture

#Link

i imagine it's like kissing an ashtray,

I hold an image of the ashtray girl
As the cigarette burns on my chest
I wrote a poem that described her world
That put my friendship to the test
And late at night
Whilst on all fours
She used to watch me kiss the floor
What's wrong with this picture?
What's wrong with this picture?

Farewell the ashtray girl
Forbidden snowflake
Beware this troubled world
Watch out for earthquakes
Goodbye to open sores
To broken semaphore
We know we miss her
We miss her picture

Sometimes it's faded
Disintegrated
For fear of growing old
Sometimes it's faded
Assassinated
For fear of growing old

Farewell the ashtray girl
Angelic fruitcake
Beware this troubled world
Control your intake
Goodbye to open sores
Goodbye and furthermore
We know we miss her
We miss her picture

Sometimes it's faded
Disintegrated
For fear of growing old
Sometimes it's faded
Assassinated
For fear of growing old

Hang on
Though we try
It's gone
Hang on
Though we try
It's gone

Sometimes it's faded
Disintegrated
For fear of growing old
Sometimes it's faded
Assassinated
For fear of growing old
Can't stop growing old...

Can't stop growing old, Can't stop growing old, Can't stop growing old, Can't stop growing old, Can't stop growing old

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Krugolina Borup 22:30 04.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Ničeov šegrt:
How does this change the fact that it is pretty nasty when you kiss a smoking person?

It doesn't do nothing for description of how it is when you kiss a smoking person. But it sure helps explain the agression with which Srki is elaborating about how he feels about smokers.

Brooklyn:
i imagine it's like kissing an ashtray, unless he/she has bad teeth. than it must be worse.

Boys, boys, boys... I really, really don't get you. Are you tied up on the bed or by the tree or something, and forcefully being kissed by smoking girls, who rape the insides of your non-smoking mouth with their smoking toungs, or what???? Smoking girls molesting you into kissing them??? I mean, really - if you don't like the way a smoking girl tastes during kissing - go get yourself a non-smoking girl to kiss. Problem solved!

But, somehow I suspect you would much rather reform and help mold the smoking one into what you would like her to be, right? Or, failing that - at least induce a feeling of being "dirty" into the girl. Sweet revange.

It all boils down to boy-girl stuff, in the end. Even smoking. Amazing.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Srki 00:27 05.11.2007

Preporuka: 7

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Krugolina Borup

Many interesting questions you raise here, Srki darling.

Sorry, Krugolina, It is very hard I would be your "darling", I don't like ashtray taste in my mouth, and cigarette stink on my cloth.

a) Everybody agrees that smoke kills smoker? Where did you get that one from? Smoking may (or may not) increase the risk of getting some forms of cancer. You can also be a life long nonsmoker and a life long passive nonsmoker - and still die of some form of cancer. You can also smoke all your life, and die of something not induced by smoking. Like, a bomb or car accident, for example. Or, of old age, even.

Are you dumb or you are pretending you are, to support your argument? I bet it is the second one, so I am not gonna walk you to wikipedia for some info on cigarette smoke analysis, you can do it yourself. But let's stick to your approach that medical doctors (and insurance agents) are full of shit and look at the statistics only. Am I wrong if I believe that you posses high-school knowledge in statistics and that you understand why the stochastic approach is used instead of deterministic? So, you understand that if some smoker do not get cancer while another 10 do, it doesn't mean that the assumption is wrong and should be abandoned, in particular not in favor of counter assumption. It doesn't mean it is right either, but it tells you undoubtedly what your odds are if you decide to gamble with your life, and lives of your close ones, to satisfy your sick desire.

Not all the humans are the same - some smokers will die in car accident, some non smokers will get lung cancer from radon in their basement. And they all contribute to the statistics. But way more of smokers is going to die as a consequence of smoking. To summarize, smoking DOES increase risk of the lung cancer death, among other things. Why? Because of the cigarette smoke ingredients, of which many are scientifically proven to be carcinogenic. And it will happen to both "active" smokers and "passive", because both inhale the same smoke. I think it is pointless to deny obvious facts to support your opinion, it just makes you look silly. Or you still believe that the Earth is flat plate, riding on turtle's back...

I guess you don't realize how poor is your argument that we all have to die of something, therefore we should let the smokers smoke. Who are you to decide in my name when and what I am going to get sick and die of? What about us who prefer of dying of aging, or falling of the mountain, or something else, instead of lung cancer or of hearth attack? It is so typical selfish smoker argument I heard so many times. They only see their ass and the institutional intervention to suppress them was the only viable option. That is why you have antismoking laws in any civilized country.

But let me ask you different question: if someone gets sick of let's say antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis. Would you let him walk on the streets, or you would rather see him quarantined?! Why, well, not everybody who gets in touch with him will necessarily develop symptoms of the decease, some of them will but maybe 15-20 years down the roadr. Why would you isolate him? He also has family, friends and he is a free citizen, so why would be he kept inside? Can you give me your honest answer, if you can, please?

b) You get the same smoke in your lungs if you passivly inhale the smoke, as the smoke a smoker gets into his/her lungs? Wrong Srki, darling! Since you were the first one to raise the question of the level of "education and information" - go inform yourself before you open your mouth next time, please.

What the f...?! Now you are playing dumb again, right? You are obviously refusing to use your common sense to prove your very shaky argument by calling me incompetent? Common, that is just plain stupid.

Now, Srki darling, that is plane rude of you! Nevaspitanje of epic proportions! Or, maybe not. Maybe it is "a condition". Maybe you are actually projecting a lot of displaced anger onto the totaly wrong and unapropriate target. I wouldn't really know. Is there a psychologer in the house?

Claptrap. Let's leave aside your psychological interpretation of my experiences, that is on the level of "Draga Ljiljo..." columns in daily journals.

Rosemary:
I can add one more thing - there is nothing as disgusting as kissing with a smoking girlfriend - I believe it tastes like a wet ashtray.

Ah... so that's where it stems from... Tell me, Srki darling, did that smoking girlfriend of yours, actually dumped you or hurt you in any way, so now all girls that smoke suffer of your displaced anger towards her?? Projection, or what?

Yeah, this shows strength of your arguments, so I'll stop here. I wish you all luck with smoking and I hope you'll be the lucky one that doesn't get cancer or stroke, that screws up the statistics, and that your loved ones also belong to the same statistical category. I'll stay away from people like you, as far as I can :-).

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

DejanOz 02:25 05.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Krugolina Borup
Smoking may (or may not) increase the risk of getting some forms of cancer.

It does so, beyond any reasonable doubt, so what is your point here? It's all just nonsense.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

ugly 08:00 05.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

It's all just nonsense.

It is more than just nonsense. It is an addiction, and addicts, as a rule, suffer from denial.

Looking at the big picture, however, let it be noted that the majority of Serbs have, sadly, perfected the art of denial on all levels of existence. Therefore, smoking becomes a minor issue. A side effect, if you will.

Molimo vas da se ulogujete ili registrujete novi nalog da biste mogli da šaljete komentare.

Krugolina Borup 11:36 05.11.2007

Preporuka: 0

Re: smokers of the world - unite!

#Link

Srki:
Sorry, Krugolina, It is very hard I would be your "darling", I don't like ashtray taste in my mouth, and cigarette stink on my cloth.

Wow! Aint't we sure of our macho irressistibility! Time-out, Srki da...beep. Big misunderstanding here!

You see, Srki da...beep, when I face the amount of agression like yours, I have one of two choices: a) sink to your level, and reply in the same fashion; or b) clasify it as childish tantrum, and switch into the motherly mode. So, it's a motherly "da...beep", Srki, da...beep. In your previous post you have called me a criminal, a Nazi and a sick person. That is not nice, Srki da...beep. That requires some motherly love to be corrected (I don't believe in punishment as corrective method, you see).

Srki:
Are you dumb or you are pretending you are, to support your argument? I bet it is the second one,

Oh, I can feel a compliment in there...:-))

Srki:
Am I wrong if I believe that you posses high-school knowledge in statistics and that you understand why the stochastic approach is used instead of deterministic?

Yes, you are wrong.

Srki:
So, you understand that if some smoker do not get cancer while another 10 do, it doesn't mean that the assumption is wrong and should be abandoned, in particular not in favor of counter assumption. It doesn't mean it is right either, but it tells you undoubtedly what your odds are if you decide to gamble with your life, and lives of your close ones, to satisfy your sick desire.

What I want to say is that I don't believe the figures that are being thrown around as the result of various researches, when it comes to anything, so smoking included, and especially when it comes to passive smoking. Let me give you an example of how careless medical profession can be with figures:

Some 20 or so years ago, UK decided to launch a campaign about drinking. The research they did show that it is ok for males to drink up to 21 units of alcohol a week, and for females, the figure was 14. The unit of alcohol was defined as: one glass of wine; one small beer; one shot of whisky or the like.

Soon after that, Danish government decides to copy the model. And they spend more then a decade and billions of DKK to advertize these limits... until they've found out that 1 unit of alcohol in UK is less in mililiters then in the rest of Europe... Like, one glass of wine in UK is 175 ml, while standard elsewhere (Denmark included) is 200. So, what they've been doing for more then a decade was PROMOTING ALCOHOLISM! With the tax payer's money.

If they can't convert properly, should I trust them to be able to count properly, too? And how many more of such research is being twisted without anyone knowing about it?

All I am saying is: don't buy directly what is being presented. Research researches and studies yourself, before forming an opinion.

Srki:
Not all the humans are the same - some smokers will die in car accident, some non smokers will get lung cancer from radon in their basement. And they all contribute to the statistics. But way more of smokers is going to die as a consequence of smoking.

Now, a question: what if a smoker dies of lung cancer, but induced from radon in their basement, not the smoking? How do they count it? As smoking or radon induced cancer? How do they discern which one was the culprit for lung cancer? I bet they go for their favorite choice: smoking. That's one of the reasons I don't trust those research figures.

Srki:
To summarize, smoking DOES increase risk of the lung cancer death, among other things.

Agree. It's the ratio between "smoking" and "other things" that I think is not being presented in the objective fashion.

Srki:
Why? Because of the cigarette smoke ingredients, of which many are scientifically proven to be carcinogenic. And it will happen to both "active" smokers and "passive", because both inhale the same smoke.

Disagree. I believe passive smoking risks have been blown way out of proportion, quite possibly totally made up. If the passive smoker dies of lung cancer induced by that basement thing, I'm sure they count it as a passive smoking death.

Statistics is like a religion. You either believe in it, or don't, or you are not sure, because you haven't been there to see it with your two own eyes.

Srki:
I think it is pointless to deny obvious facts to support your opinion, it just makes you look silly. Or you still believe that the Earth is flat plate, riding on turtle's back...

Ok, there goes another one. I'm not just a criminal, a Naci, a sick person.... I'm a silly criminal, silly Naci, and a silly sick person.

Srki:
I guess you don't realize how poor is your argument that we all have to die of something, therefore we should let the smokers smoke. Who are you to decide in my name when and what I am going to get sick and die of?

That is EXACTLY my question! Who are you to decide for me that I should not die of smoking?

Srki:
What about us who prefer of dying of aging, or falling of the mountain, or something else, instead of lung cancer or of hearth attack?

Be my guest, take your pick. Die whichever way you want.

Srki:
But let me ask you different question: if someone gets sick of let's say antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis. Would you let him walk on the streets, or you would rather see him quarantined?! Why, well, not everybody who gets in touch with him will necessarily develop symptoms of the decease, some of them will but maybe 15-20 years down the road. Why would you isolate him? He also has family, friends and he is a free citizen, so why would be he kept inside? Can you give me your honest answer, if you can, please?

No sweat, Srki da...beep.
You are comparing uncomparable things here: a contagious disease with the harmless smoking. I can agree that there is some viability in the scientific claims that smoking can increase the risk for catching up some diseases. But I do not buy the passive smoking health risks at all. And it is not like I'm talking about this without anything to back it up. There ARE studies that conclude passive smoking is harmless.

Srki:
Claptrap. Let's leave aside your psychological interpretation of my experiences, that is on the level of "Draga Ljiljo..." columns in daily journals

No, it's not. It's on the level of "Draga Saveta...".

Srki:
Yeah, t